Neuroeconomic Appeal - "in This Case"  

Abstract Category: Laws
Course / Degree: Neuroeconomic Law
Institution / University: Fine Fitness Foundation/UCLA, United States
Published in: 2013

Thesis Abstract / Summary:

The 1. [key] > knowledge empowers you in all oral arguments. The primary premise

 of this thesis is - that the 2. [abc'] > (a)ttitude + (b)rief + (c)onversation you have with "the court" 

creates an evironment of respect, and therefore creates a platform of performance,

  and - with its structure comes 3. [light] > logically illuminating good highlighted themes 

positioned to produce substance.

 At it's 4. [core] > cognitive order respecting everything

 linked to the 5. [court] > centrally ordering uniformed relevant themes.

Thus - it is essential to maintain respect from 'the court' which through process

 subconciously enhances 6. [focus] >  forming optimum concentration unleashing success.

This order provides 7. [beat] > best evidence signaling theme in the court

through conversation from counsel.

Furthermore - the fundamentals increases '(a)wareness + (b)alance + (c)onditioning'

makes it possible to 8. [(a)ct] > activate critical thinking 9. [(b)e] > breathe effectively

10. [(c)are] > create a rewarding environment

 to perform at an elevated level.

 This platform in itself reflects important

11. [steps] > showing thematic evidence powering structure

specifically in the oral argument.

The fundamental 12. [link] >logically illuminating natural knowledge

between the

 13. [mind] > master internal navigating device

 and - the

14. [brain] > brilliant resource absorbing information neurologically. 

Best conversation and courtesy is the understanding of power

 that oral argument will require

. Given the fact - it is the power which fuels the energy,

that gives rise to higher communications

in the court.

The thesis looks at 15. [law] > logic and words 

and its 16. [load] > or in other words

 'logical oral argument drawn'

to provide a clear and compelling case

 for affirmation or reversal.

  The author makes the 17. [case] > critical analysis seeks evidence

 for the 18. [rule] > requiring unique legal examination to reach the

(a)ppeciation, (b)alance & (c)onclusion.

 Ronnie C. Wright

Ronnie C. Wright is the world's first Acroneticist,

inventor of Acronetics and Neuroacronetics,

expert in Neuroeconomics.

He is Official Registered with the State Of California Bar,

Office Of Admissions.

Thesis Keywords/Search Tags:
Neuroeconomics, Law, Appeal, In This Case, Ronnie C. Wright

This Thesis Abstract may be cited as follows:
No user preference. Please use the standard reference methodology.

Submission Details: Thesis Abstract submitted by RonnieC Wright from United States on 19-Jan-2013 01:06.
Abstract has been viewed 2709 times (since 7 Mar 2010).

RonnieC Wright Contact Details: Email: president@stayfine.org

Great care has been taken to ensure that this information is correct, however ThesisAbstracts.com cannot accept responsibility for the contents of this Thesis abstract titled "Neuroeconomic Appeal - "in This Case"". This abstract has been submitted by RonnieC Wright on 19-Jan-2013 01:06. You may report a problem using the contact form.
© Copyright 2003 - 2020 of ThesisAbstracts.com and respective owners.

Copyright © Thesis Abstract | Dissertation Abstracts Thesis Library 2003-2020.
by scope.com.mt @ website design